On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 19:12 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> > Using the extension saves a bit of code.
> > +               seq_printf(m, "faux/mst: %*ph\n", 2, buf);
> > +               seq_printf(m, "mst ctrl: %*ph\n", 1, buf);
> > +               seq_printf(m, "branch oui: %*phN devid: ", 3, buf);
> 
> All above may use shorter form, i.e.
> "..., "%Xph", buf);", where X is a constant written explicitly inplace.

I know.  Consistency is better though.
Note the use of DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE, etc...

Reply via email to