On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:11:38PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:46 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:55:54PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * find the upstream PCIE-to-PCI bridge of a PCI device
> > > + * if the device is PCIE, return NULL
> > > + * if the device isn't connected to a PCIE bridge (that is its parent is
> > > a
> > > + * legacy PCI bridge and the bridge is directly connected to bus 0),
> > > return its
> > > + * parent
> > > + */
> > > +struct pci_dev *
> > > +pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *tmp = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + if (pdev->is_pcie)
> > > + return NULL;
> > > + while (1) {
> > > + if (!pdev->bus->self)
> > > + break;
> > > + pdev = pdev->bus->self;
> > > + /* a p2p bridge */
> > > + if (!pdev->is_pcie) {
> > > + tmp = pdev;
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > + /* PCI device should connect to a PCIE bridge */
> > > + BUG_ON(pdev->pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE);
> > > + return pdev;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return tmp;
> > > +}
> >
> > No locking while you walk up the bus list?
> hmm, iommu driver didn't support pci hotplug in current stage. But we
> can add lock here.
Please do, as PCI-E hotplug is much more common than PCI hotplug these
days (think ExpressCard in millions of laptops...)
> > > --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/include/linux/pci.h 2007-04-03
> > > 04:30:51.000000000 -0700
> > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/include/linux/pci.h 2007-04-03 06:58:58.000000000
> > > -0700
> > > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
> > > unsigned short subsystem_device;
> > > unsigned int class; /* 3 bytes: (base,sub,prog-if) */
> > > u8 hdr_type; /* PCI header type (`multi' flag masked
> > > out) */
> > > + u8 pcie_type; /* PCI-E device/port type */
> > > u8 rom_base_reg; /* which config register controls the
> > > ROM */
> > > u8 pin; /* which interrupt pin this device uses
> > > */
> > >
> > > @@ -168,6 +169,7 @@
> > > unsigned int msi_enabled:1;
> > > unsigned int msix_enabled:1;
> > > unsigned int is_managed:1;
> > > + unsigned int is_pcie:1;
> >
> > Do you really need both fields? Wouldn't just the pcie_type one work
> > (with some NOT_PCIE type being set for it if it isn't I suppose.)
> There are some encodings are reserved for future. Just don't want to use
> reserved bits, as we don't know which one is proper for NOT_PCIE.
What are the current encodings? I don't have my copy of the pci spec
availble at the moment...
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
