Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.
I have a mental note that unionfs is in the "stuck" state, due to general
agreement that we should implement this functionality at the VFS level, one
reason for which is unionfs's upper-vs-lower coherency problems.
How can a union file system with a decent set of useful semantics be
fully implemented at the VFS layer in a "clean" manner?
For instance, a major use of unionfs is live CDs, namely unionfs w/ a
read-only and read-write layer. Unionfs enables files to be copied up
from the read-only layer to the read-write layer.
Does one really want to implement "copyup" in the VFS?
just my 2 agarot.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
