Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 23:16:21 -0800 From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David S. Miller" wrote: > It is clear though, that something is messing with or corrupting the > packets. One thing you might try is turning off TCP header > compression for the PPP link, does this make a difference? Actually, there has been several reports that turning header compression does help. If this is what is causing the TCP sequence numbers to change then either Win98's or Earthlink terminal server's implementation of TCP header compression is buggy. Assuming this is true, it explains why Win98's TCP does not "see" the data sent by Linux, because such a bug would make the TCP checksum of these packets incorrect and thus dropped by Win98's TCP. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win9... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> ... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-&... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 &... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.... David S. Miller