On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:29:25PM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>>       struct cpu_cache_level *caches;
>>       u32 cnt, i, version;
>> @@ -2084,8 +2073,7 @@ static int process_cache(struct perf_file_section 
>> *section __maybe_unused,
>>  struct feature_ops {
>>       int (*write)(struct feat_fd *ff, struct perf_evlist *evlist);
>>       void (*print)(struct feat_fd *ff, FILE *fp);
>> -     int (*process)(struct perf_file_section *section,
>> -                    struct feat_fd *ff, void *data);
>> +     int (*process)(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data);
>>       const char *name;
>>       bool full_only;
>>  };
>> @@ -2616,9 +2604,11 @@ static int perf_file_section__process(struct 
>> perf_file_section *section,
>>                                     struct perf_header *ph,
>>                                     int feat, int fd, void *data)
>>  {
>> -     struct feat_fd ff = {
>> +     struct feat_fd fdd = {
>
> no need to rename to fdd
fixed
>
> jirka

Reply via email to