* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:15:39 +0900 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > The problem is that to use hard_smp_processor_id in UP kernels just
> > including linux/smp.h does not suffice anymore. Now
> > hard_smp_processor_id is architecture specific code and consequently
> > asm/smp.h should be included explicitly.
> 
> yeah.  The fact that linux/smp.h only exposes asm/smp.h if CONFIG_SMP hits
> us again and again and again.  It would be good to fix that up, I guess by
> including asm/smp.h unconditionally from within linux/smp.h.
> 
> But that's a separate little project.
> 
> > Mathieu, does the (untested) patch below fix this issue?
> 

With this patch, sparc64 builds correctly. Thanks!


> I'll test it.
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to