On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Dawid Kurek <dawi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Smaller scope reduces visibility of variable and makes usage of
> uninitialized variable less possible.
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index f32506a..ea5a9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -108,10 +108,11 @@ struct drm_atomic_state *
>  drm_atomic_state_alloc(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>       struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config;
> -     struct drm_atomic_state *state;
>  
>       if (!config->funcs->atomic_state_alloc) {
> -             state = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> +             struct drm_atomic_state *state
> +                     = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);

Separate declaration and initialization would lead to a cleaner patch
and result.

BR,
Jani.

> +
>               if (!state)
>                       return NULL;
>               if (drm_atomic_state_init(dev, state) < 0) {

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Reply via email to