On Sat, 2017-06-17 at 21:38 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > But we don't accept kernel patches for some mythical future option > that might be happening some time in the future. Heck, I'm still not > convinced that firmware signing isn't anything more than just some > snakeoil in the first place!
I for one really want the "firmware" signing, because I want to load the regulatory database through this API, and But honestly, I've been waiting for years for that now and started looking at what it would take to hand-implement that on top of the existing firmware API. Probably not all that much. johannes
