On Apr 11 2007 21:48, Willy Tarreau wrote: >On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:23:31AM -0300, Pedro wrote: >> After suffering some days from a not|mis configured tmpfs, >> >> As the OOM killer is not Posix, >> >> Better than to kill processes would be to resize tmpfs, to use tmpfs empty >> space. > >Will not work, because tmpfs does not use any memory for unused space. If >you don't believe me, simply create a large file on your tmpfs, then check >free memory, then remove the file and check free memory again. > >So your problem is not caused by the empty space on tmpfs, but either by >too much space used on tmpfs or by your application using too much memory. > >> I'm using kernel 2.6.20.4. If someone ask I'll send a test application. > >Not needed, the one-liner "main(){while(malloc(4096));}" is enough to >trigger an OOM.
No, that won't do anything, malloc happily returns NULL after a few seconds. int main() { while(1) { char *p = malloc(4096); *p = 1; } } This is more likely to trigger OOM, because it actually dirties the page. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/