==> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:29:28 -0700, "Ken Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Ken> On 4/11/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken> > On 4/11/07, Zach Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken> > > First, I'll NAK this and all AIO patches until the patch Ken> description > > says that it's been run through the regression Ken> tests that we've started > > collecting in autotest. They're Ken> trivial to run, never fear: Ken> > Ken> > OK. I will run those regression tests. Ken> Unfortunately, the aio_dio_bugs test in autotest has bug in it Ken> :-( We need stress test the "test code". Ken> on stock 2.6.21-rc6 kernel: Ken> [rock-me-baby]$ cd autotest/tests/aio_dio_bugs/src Ken> [rock-me-baby]$ make [rock-me-baby]$ Ken> ./aio-free-ring-with-bogus-nr-pages Ken> aio-free-ring-with-bogus-nr-pages: Error: io_setup returned -22, Ken> expected -ENOMEM Ken> hmm??? The problem is that the test code forgot to initialized Ken> ctx variable and in the kernel, sys_io_setup returns EINVAL if Ken> user address contain none-zero value. Zach had already sent a fix for that. I wonder why it didn't go in. I didn't see any response to Zach's request for code that actually tests out the shared ring buffer. Do you have such code? -Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
