From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

The pointer intel_ucode_patch does not need to be in global scope,
so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warning:
"symbol 'intel_ucode_patch' was not declared. Should it be static?"

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index d525a0bd7d28..59edbe9d4ccb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
 
 /* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
-struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch;
+static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch;
 
 static inline bool cpu_signatures_match(unsigned int s1, unsigned int p1,
                                        unsigned int s2, unsigned int p2)
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to