On 12/06/2017 20:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, June 12, 2017 05:55:10 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> Some hardware have clusters with different idle states. The current code does >> not support this and fails as it expects all the idle states to be identical. >> >> Because of this, the Mediatek mtk8173 had to create the same idle state for a >> big.Little system and now the Hisilicon 960 is facing the same situation. >> >> Solve this by simply assuming the multiple driver will be needed for all the >> platforms using the ARM generic cpuidle driver which makes sense because of >> the >> different topologies we can support with a single kernel for ARM32 or ARM64. >> >> Every CPU has its own driver, so every single CPU can specify in the DT the >> idle states. >> >> This simple approach allows to support the future dynamIQ system, current SMP >> and HMP. >> >> Tested on: >> - 96boards: Hikey 620 >> - 96boards: Hikey 960 >> - 96boards: dragonboard410c >> - Mediatek 8173 >> >> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> >> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com> >> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> > > There seems to have been quite some discussion regarding this one and I'm not > sure about the resolution of it. > > I'd feel more comfortable with an ACK or Reviewed-by from Sudeep or Lorenzo > here.
Hi Rafael, just a gentle reminder, Sudeep acked the patch. Thanks. -- Daniel -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
