* Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > I've applied the first patch to the scheduler tree yesterday, but the > > > > other > > > > changes unfortunately conflicted with other pending scheduler work - > > > > could > > > > you please re-post the other 3 patches on top of tip:sched/core? > > > > > > Sure, here they are. > > > > Hm, what tree is this against? First patch won't apply to the latest > > tip:sched/core: > > > > patching file kernel/sched/core.c > > Hunk #7 succeeded at 5253 (offset -2 lines). > > Hunk #8 FAILED at 5285. > > Hunk #9 succeeded at 5581 (offset 1 line). > > Hunk #10 succeeded at 6485 (offset 1 line). > > 1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched/core.c > > That's against my copy of tip/sched/core as of yesterday: > > commit f11cc0760b8397e0d230122606421b6a96e9f869 > Author: Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net> > AuthorDate: Wed Jun 14 19:37:30 2017 -0700 > Commit: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> > CommitDate: Tue Jun 20 12:48:37 2017 +0200 > > sched/core: Drop the unused try_get_task_struct() helper function > > on which I pre-applied my previous patch #1/4 ("cpuset/sched: cpuset > makes sense for SMP only") you said having already applied on your side > but that didn't show up in the publicly visible sched/core yet.
I see where the mismatch comes from - I applied this one from your earlier patches: f5832c1998af: sched/core: Omit building stop_sched_class when !SMP ... thus #1/4 was missing from my stack of patches. I'll apply that too and re-try, no need to resend. Thanks, Ingo