Hi Rob,

On 23-06-2017 22:58, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:26:12PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Document the bindings for the Synopsys Designware HDMI RX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joab...@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Carlos Palminha <palmi...@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
>> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <snawro...@kernel.org>
>>
>> Changes from v3:
>>      - Document the new DT bindings suggested by Sylwester
>> Changes from v2:
>>      - Document edid-phandle property
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt  | 70 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..efb0ac3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
>> +Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX Decoder
>> +===================================
>> +
>> +This document defines device tree properties for the Synopsys DesignWare 
>> HDMI
>> +RX Decoder (DWC HDMI RX). It doesn't constitute a device tree binding
>> +specification by itself but is meant to be referenced by platform-specific
>> +device tree bindings.
>> +
>> +When referenced from platform device tree bindings the properties defined in
>> +this document are defined as follows.
>> +
>> +- compatible: Shall be "snps,dw-hdmi-rx".
>> +
>> +- reg: Memory mapped base address and length of the DWC HDMI RX registers.
>> +
>> +- interrupts: Reference to the DWC HDMI RX interrupt and 5v sense interrupt.
>> +
>> +- clocks: Phandle to the config clock block.
>> +
>> +- clock-names: Shall be "cfg-clk".
> "-clk" is redundant.
>
> Seems strange that this is the only clock. The only other clock is the 
> HDMI clock from the HDMI transmitter.

Its a receiver so it gets driven by the transmitter. In my
implementation I only need to configure this clock in the
controller so that it knows the timebase. I will change to "cfg"
only then.

>
>> +
>> +- edid-phandle: phandle to the EDID handler block.
>> +
>> +- #address-cells: Shall be 1.
>> +
>> +- #size-cells: Shall be 0.
>> +
>> +You also have to create a subnode for phy driver. Phy properties are as 
>> follows.
>> +
>> +- compatible: Shall be "snps,dw-hdmi-phy-e405".
>> +
>> +- reg: Shall be JTAG address of phy.
>> +
>> +- clocks: Phandle for cfg clock.
>> +
>> +- clock-names:Shall be "cfg-clk".
>> +
>> +A sample binding is now provided. The compatible string is for a SoC which 
>> has
>> +has a Synopsys Designware HDMI RX decoder inside.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +dw_hdmi_soc: dw-hdmi-soc@0 {
>> +    compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-soc";
> Not documented.

Yes, its a sample binding which reflects a wrapper driver that
shall instantiate the controller driver (and this wrapper driver
is not in this patch series), should I remove this?

>
>> +    reg = <0x11c00 0x1000>; /* EDIDs */
>> +    #address-cells = <1>;
>> +    #size-cells = <1>;
>> +    ranges;
>> +
>> +    dw_hdmi_rx@0 {
> hdmi-rx@0

Ok.

>
>> +            compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-rx";
>> +            reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
>> +            interrupts = <1 2>;
>> +            edid-phandle = <&dw_hdmi_soc>;
> Don't need this if it is the parent node.

Sometimes it will not be the parent node (if edid handling is
done in a separate driver, for example).

>
>> +
>> +            clocks = <&dw_hdmi_refclk>;
>> +            clock-names = "cfg-clk";
>> +
>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>> +            #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +            dw_hdmi_phy_e405@fc {
> hdmi-phy@fc

Ok.

>
>> +                    compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-phy-e405";
>> +                    reg = <0xfc>;
>> +
>> +                    clocks = <&dw_hdmi_refclk>;
>> +                    clock-names = "cfg-clk";

I will also change this to "cfg" only.

Thanks for the review!

Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu

>> +            };
>> +    };
>> +};
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>

Reply via email to