On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 18:12 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Also note that your use of task_h_load() in the new numa thing > suffers > from exactly the problem effective_load() is trying to solve.
Thinking about this some more, I suspect that using effective_load() in combination with select_idle_sibling(), which will often place the task on a different CPU than the one specified, may not lead to entirely useful results... -- All rights reversed
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
