2017-06-28 22:11 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>: > > > On 28/06/2017 16:09, Wanpeng Li wrote: >>> Yes, this was my question essentially. I would still migrate >>> nested_apf_token (as part of nested virt state), and then clear it in >>> KVM when doing the async-pf broadcast. >> Do you mean I should save nested_apf_token by GET_VCPU_EVENTS and >> restore it by SET_VCPU_EVENTS? I utilize the place of "u8 pad" in >> kvm_vcpu_events to hold nested_apf, however nested_apf_token is >> unsigned long. > > If for now we can leave out the GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS changes, that would > be best. nested_apf and nested_apf_token should be migrated together > with the rest of the nested virt state.
Radim explains why we at least needs nested_apf here: > nested_apf is not #PF: if we didn't pass nested_apf, then the exception would > be injected as #PF to L2 after migration. Do you mean we can ignore it here and depends on Jim's patches to completely handle it? Regards, Wanpeng Li
