On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:47 AM, David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> wrote:
>>
>> temp = bdc_readl(bdc->regs, BDC_BDCSC);
>> if ((temp & BDC_P64) &&
>> !dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
>> - dev_dbg(bdc->dev, "Using 64-bit address\n");
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Using 64-bit address\n");
>> } else {
>> - ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>
> That just wrong...
> Or was wrong before.
Why is this wrong?
Al
