On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 10:55:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Yeah. Note that there are some subtle but crutial differences between > PlugSched (which Con used, and which i opposed in the past) and this > approach. > PlugSched cuts the interfaces at a high level in a monolithic way and > introduces kernel/scheduler.c that uses one pluggable scheduler > (represented via the 'scheduler' global template) at a time.
What I originally did did so for a good reason, which was that it was intended to support far more radical reorganizations, for instance, things that changed the per-cpu runqueue affairs for gang scheduling. I wrote a top-level driver that did support scheduling classes in a similar fashion, though it didn't survive others maintaining the patches. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
