Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> It's a shame kthread_stop() (may take a while!) runs with a global semaphore
> held. With this patch kthread() allocates all neccesary data (struct kthread)
> on its own stack, globals kthread_stop_xxx are deleted.

Oleg so fare you patches  have been inspiring.  However..

> HACKS:
>
>       - re-use task_struct->set_child_tid to point to "struct kthread"

         task_struct->vfork_done is a better cannidate.

>       - use do_exit() directly to preserve "struct kthread" on stack

Calling do_exit directly like that is not a hack, as it appears the preferred
way to exit is to call do_exit, or complete_and_exit.

While this does improve the scalability and remove a global variable.  It
also introduces a complex special case in the form of struct kthread.

It also doesn't solve the biggest problem with the current kthread interface
in that calling kthread_stop does not cause the code to break out of
interruptible sleeps.

>  static int kthread(void *_create)
>  {
> -     struct kthread_create_info *create = _create;
> -     int (*threadfn)(void *data);
> -     void *data;
> -     int ret = -EINTR;
> +     struct kthread self = {
> +             .task = current,
> +             .err = -EINTR,
> +     };
>  
>       /* Copy data: it's on kthread's stack */
> -     threadfn = create->threadfn;
> -     data = create->data;
> +     struct kthread_create_info *create = _create;
> +     int (*threadfn)(void *data) = create->threadfn;
> +     void *data = create->data;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * This should be enough to assure that self is still on
> +      * stack when we enter do_exit()
> +      */
> +     set_kthread(&self);
> +     create->result = &self;
>  

> @@ -91,7 +105,7 @@ static void create_kthread(struct kthrea
>  
>       /* We want our own signal handler (we take no signals by default). */
>       pid = kernel_thread(kthread, create, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | SIGCHLD);
> -     create->result = pid;
> +     create->result = ERR_PTR(pid);

Ouch.    You have a nasty race here.

If kthread runs before kernel_thread returns then setting
"create->result = ERR_PTR(pid);" could easily stomp 
"create->result = &self".


Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to