* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One other thing, what happens in the case of slow, frequency changing, > are/or inaccurate clocks .. Is the old sched_clock behavior still > tolerated?
yeah, good question. Yesterday i did a quick testboot with that too, and it seemed to behave pretty OK with the low-res [jiffies based] sched_clock() too. Although in that case things are much more of an approximation and rounding/arithmetics artifacts are possible. CFS works best with a high-resolution cycle counter. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/