On 29-06-17, 14:23, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 10:56 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > From: Steve Muckle <smuckle.li...@gmail.com> > > > > In preparation for the scheduler cpufreq callback happening on remote > > CPUs, check for this case in intel_pstate which currently requires > > the > > callback run on the local CPU. Such callbacks are ignored for now. > Is it possible that we miss a chance to calculate load periodically at > a predefined interval (10ms default), because the callback happened on > a different CPU?
We aren't updating cpu->sample.time for remote callbacks here, so no we shouldn't miss anything. -- viresh
