On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Ingo could have publicly spoken with them about his ideas of killing > the O(1) scheduler and replacing it with an rbtree-based one, and using > part of Bill's work to speed up development.
He did exactly that and he did it with a patch. Nothing new here. This is how development on LKML proceeds when you have two or more competing designs. There's absolutely no need to get upset or hurt your feelings over it. It's not malicious, it's how we do Linux development. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
