On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 11:57:12AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 4 July 2017 at 11:44, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> > But but but, how can that happen? Should it not all be under the same > > rq->lock and thus have only a single update_rq_clock() and thus be at > > the same 'instant' ? > > idle_balance() unlock rq->lock before calling update_blocked_averages > And update_blocked_averages() starts by calling update_rq_clock() Ah indeed. Might want to clarify that point.
