Em Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:22:35 -0700 Jim Davis <jim.ep...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 > > Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > >> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already > >> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could > >> try to cherry-pick through stable. > > > > I kind of gave up on the 4.12 goal, at least for now. The number of > > complaints has not been huge - I suspect you're far from the only one who > > is not too worried about building PDFs...:) > > If fixing pdf (and ps) builds isn't worth the bother -- which I > wouldn't debate -- then it's best to just drop those build targets. > The only worrisome thing I see here is having build targets carried > from release to release that don't work. My $5 cents on that. We do automatic pdf builds at linuxtv.org since when we moved the media books to Sphinx. In order to avoid regressions, we use a virtual environment for Sphinx, and we only update to a newer version after checking if the upgrade won't break build. Currently, it is running Sphinx version 1.4.9. I did a grep on the access for the media.pdf doc at the apache's log. We don't keep a long history there. We had 41 accesses to the pdf logs over the last ~3 days, with means that people are finding PDF output useful. - >From my side, I like having everything into a single file specially when I'm needing to find things at the document. Well, ePub sort of provides that, but it is a way worse than PDF or html, specially when big tables are there. Btw, over the last ~3 days, we had only 1 access to the ePub version. So, not a very popular format. Thanks, Mauro
