Hi Sylwester,

On 05-07-2017 21:52, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 07/04/2017 04:11 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Document the bindings for the Synopsys Designware HDMI RX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joab...@synopsys.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt  | 70 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt
> Could you make the DT binding documentation patch first patch in the series?
> Now checkpatch will complain about undocumented compatible string when 
> the driver patches are applied alone.

Sure.

>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..449b8a2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/snps,dw-hdmi-rx.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
>> +Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX Decoder
>> +===================================
>> +
>> +This document defines device tree properties for the Synopsys DesignWare 
>> HDMI
>> +RX Decoder (DWC HDMI RX). It doesn't constitute a device tree binding
>> +specification by itself but is meant to be referenced by platform-specific
>> +device tree bindings.
>> +
>> +When referenced from platform device tree bindings the properties defined in
>> +this document are defined as follows.
> It would be good to make it clear which properties are required and which are
> optional. And also to mention the properties below belong to the HDMI RX node.

Ok.

>
>> +- compatible: Shall be "snps,dw-hdmi-rx".
>> +
>> +- reg: Memory mapped base address and length of the DWC HDMI RX registers.
>> +
>> +- interrupts: Reference to the DWC HDMI RX interrupt and 5v sense interrupt.
> s/5v/HDMI 5V ?

Ok.

>
>> +
>> +- clocks: Phandle to the config clock block.
>> +
>> +- clock-names: Shall be "cfg".
>> +
>> +- edid-phandle: phandle to the EDID handler block.
> Could you make this property optional and when it is missing assume that 
> device
> corresponding to the parent node of this node handles EDID? This way we could
> avoid having property pointing to the parent node.

Hmm, this is for the CEC notifier. Do you mean I should grab the
parent device for the notifier? This property is already optional
if cec is not enabled though.

>
>> +- #address-cells: Shall be 1.
>> +
>> +- #size-cells: Shall be 0.
>> +
>> +You also have to create a subnode for phy driver. Phy properties are as 
>> follows.
> s/phy driver. Phy/the PHY device. PHY ?
>
> Might be also worth to make it explicit these are all required properties.

Ok.

>
>> +- compatible: Shall be "snps,dw-hdmi-phy-e405".
>> +
>> +- reg: Shall be JTAG address of phy.
> s/phy/the PHY ?

Ok.

>
>> +- clocks: Phandle for cfg clock.
>> +
>> +- clock-names:Shall be "cfg".
>> +
>> +A sample binding is now provided. The compatible string is for a SoC which 
>> has
>> +has a Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX decoder inside.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +dw_hdmi_soc: dw-hdmi-soc@0 {
>> +    compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-soc";
> Perhaps just make it
>
>       compatible = "...";
> ?

Yeah, probably its better.

>
>> +    reg = <0x11c00 0x1000>; /* EDIDs */
> This is not relevant and undocumented, will likely be part of documentation 
> of other binding thus I'd suggest dropping this reg property.

Ok.

>
>> +    #address-cells = <1>;
>> +    #size-cells = <1>;
>> +    ranges;
>> +
>> +    hdmi-rx@0 {
>> +            compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-rx";
>> +            reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
>> +            interrupts = <1 2>;
>> +            edid-phandle = <&dw_hdmi_soc>;
>> +
>> +            clocks = <&dw_hdmi_refclk>;
>> +            clock-names = "cfg";
>> +
>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>> +            #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +            hdmi-phy@fc {
>> +                    compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-phy-e405";
>> +                    reg = <0xfc>;
>> +
>> +                    clocks = <&dw_hdmi_refclk>;
>> +                    clock-names = "cfg";
>> +            };
>> +    };
>> +};
> Otherwise looks good. I'll likely not have comments to the other patches.

Thanks for the review!

Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu

>
> --
> Regards,
> Sylwester
>  

Reply via email to