Michal Hocko wrote: > On Sat 01-07-17 20:43:56, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > > It is really hard to pursue this half solution when there is no clear > > > indication it helps in your testing. So could you try to test with only > > > this patch on top of the current linux-next tree (or Linus tree) and see > > > if you can reproduce the problem? > > > > With this patch on top of next-20170630, I no longer hit this problem. > > (Of course, this is because this patch eliminates the infinite loop.) > > I assume you haven't seen other negative side effects, like unexpected > OOMs etc... Are you willing to give your Tested-by?
I didn't see other negative side effects. Tested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> We need long time for testing this patch at linux-next.git (and I give up this handy bug for finding other bugs under almost OOM situation).