From: Denis Lunev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

There is a race between netlink_dump_start() and netlink_release()
that can lead to the situation when a netlink socket with non-zero
callback is freed.
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c  2004-10-25 12:12:23.000000000 +0400
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c  2004-10-28 16:26:12.000000000 +0400
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket
                return 0;
 
        netlink_remove(sk);
+       sock_orphan(sk);
        nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
 
        spin_lock(&nlk->cb_lock);
@@ -269,7 +270,6 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket
        /* OK. Socket is unlinked, and, therefore,
           no new packets will arrive */
 
-       sock_orphan(sk);
        sock->sk = NULL;
        wake_up_interruptible_all(&nlk->wait);
 
@@ -942,9 +942,9 @@ int netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk,
                return -ECONNREFUSED;
        }
        nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
-       /* A dump is in progress... */
+       /* A dump or destruction is in progress... */
        spin_lock(&nlk->cb_lock);
-       if (nlk->cb) {
+       if (nlk->cb || sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
                spin_unlock(&nlk->cb_lock);
                netlink_destroy_callback(cb);
                sock_put(sk);

Reply via email to