On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 07:13:30AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > 于 2017年7月7日 GMT+08:00 上午4:50:30, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> 写到: > >On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:28:22PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN(B, 0), > >> SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"), > >> SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x1, "gpio_out"), > >> - SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "i2c0")), /* SCK */ > >> + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "i2c0"), /* SCK */ > >> + SUNXI_FUNCTION_VARIANT(0x3, > >> + "pll_lock_dbg", > >> + PINCTRL_SUN8I_R40)), > > > >You have a number of lines where the wrapping is not consistent with > >the rest, such as this one, but also... > > I think this one is because of extraordinary function name.
Since you don't have a comment, I guess that's not really that bad. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
