With some configs, objtool reports the following warning:

  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.o: warning: objtool: ftrace_modify_code_direct()+0x2d: 
sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame

The instruction it's complaining about isn't actually a sibling call.
It's just a normal jump to an address inside the function.  Objtool
thought it was a sibling call because the instruction's jump_dest wasn't
initialized because the function was supposed to be ignored due to its
use of sync_core().

Objtool ended up validating the function instead of ignoring it because
it didn't properly recognize a sibling call to the function.  So fix the
sibling call logic.  Also add a warning to catch ignored functions being
validated so we'll get a more useful error message next time.

Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
---
 tools/objtool/check.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index fea2221..2c6d748 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -1371,6 +1371,12 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, 
struct instruction *first,
 
                func = insn->func;
 
+               if (func && insn->ignore) {
+                       WARN_FUNC("BUG: why am I validating an ignored 
function?",
+                                 sec, insn->offset);
+                       return -1;
+               }
+
                if (insn->visited) {
                        if (!!insn_state_match(insn, &state))
                                return 1;
@@ -1426,16 +1432,19 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, 
struct instruction *first,
 
                case INSN_JUMP_CONDITIONAL:
                case INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL:
-                       if (insn->jump_dest) {
+                       if (insn->jump_dest &&
+                           (!func || !insn->jump_dest->func ||
+                            func == insn->jump_dest->func)) {
                                ret = validate_branch(file, insn->jump_dest,
                                                      state);
                                if (ret)
                                        return 1;
+
                        } else if (func && has_modified_stack_frame(&state)) {
                                WARN_FUNC("sibling call from callable 
instruction with modified stack frame",
                                          sec, insn->offset);
                                return 1;
-                       } /* else it's a sibling call */
+                       }
 
                        if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL)
                                return 0;
-- 
2.7.5

Reply via email to