From: Aubrey Li <aubrey...@linux.intel.com>

For what cpuidle governor already does, we remove them from menu governor
---
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 163 ---------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 163 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
index b2330fd..f90c1a8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@
 
 struct menu_device {
        int             last_state_idx;
-       int             needs_update;
 
        unsigned int    next_timer_us;
        unsigned int    predicted_us;
@@ -190,91 +189,6 @@ static inline int performance_multiplier(unsigned long 
nr_iowaiters, unsigned lo
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);
 
-static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device 
*dev);
-
-/*
- * Try detecting repeating patterns by keeping track of the last 8
- * intervals, and checking if the standard deviation of that set
- * of points is below a threshold. If it is... then use the
- * average of these 8 points as the estimated value.
- */
-static unsigned int get_typical_interval(struct menu_device *data)
-{
-       int i, divisor;
-       unsigned int max, thresh, avg;
-       uint64_t sum, variance;
-
-       thresh = UINT_MAX; /* Discard outliers above this value */
-
-again:
-
-       /* First calculate the average of past intervals */
-       max = 0;
-       sum = 0;
-       divisor = 0;
-       for (i = 0; i < INTERVALS; i++) {
-               unsigned int value = data->intervals[i];
-               if (value <= thresh) {
-                       sum += value;
-                       divisor++;
-                       if (value > max)
-                               max = value;
-               }
-       }
-       if (divisor == INTERVALS)
-               avg = sum >> INTERVAL_SHIFT;
-       else
-               avg = div_u64(sum, divisor);
-
-       /* Then try to determine variance */
-       variance = 0;
-       for (i = 0; i < INTERVALS; i++) {
-               unsigned int value = data->intervals[i];
-               if (value <= thresh) {
-                       int64_t diff = (int64_t)value - avg;
-                       variance += diff * diff;
-               }
-       }
-       if (divisor == INTERVALS)
-               variance >>= INTERVAL_SHIFT;
-       else
-               do_div(variance, divisor);
-
-       /*
-        * The typical interval is obtained when standard deviation is
-        * small (stddev <= 20 us, variance <= 400 us^2) or standard
-        * deviation is small compared to the average interval (avg >
-        * 6*stddev, avg^2 > 36*variance). The average is smaller than
-        * UINT_MAX aka U32_MAX, so computing its square does not
-        * overflow a u64. We simply reject this candidate average if
-        * the standard deviation is greater than 715 s (which is
-        * rather unlikely).
-        *
-        * Use this result only if there is no timer to wake us up sooner.
-        */
-       if (likely(variance <= U64_MAX/36)) {
-               if ((((u64)avg*avg > variance*36) && (divisor * 4 >= INTERVALS 
* 3))
-                                                       || variance <= 400) {
-                       return avg;
-               }
-       }
-
-       /*
-        * If we have outliers to the upside in our distribution, discard
-        * those by setting the threshold to exclude these outliers, then
-        * calculate the average and standard deviation again. Once we get
-        * down to the bottom 3/4 of our samples, stop excluding samples.
-        *
-        * This can deal with workloads that have long pauses interspersed
-        * with sporadic activity with a bunch of short pauses.
-        */
-       if ((divisor * 4) <= INTERVALS * 3)
-               return UINT_MAX;
-
-       thresh = max - 1;
-       goto again;
-}
-
 /**
  * menu_select - selects the next idle state to enter
  * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data
@@ -291,11 +205,6 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct 
cpuidle_device *dev)
        unsigned long nr_iowaiters, cpu_load;
        int resume_latency = dev_pm_qos_raw_read_value(device);
 
-       if (data->needs_update) {
-               menu_update(drv, dev);
-               data->needs_update = 0;
-       }
-
        /* resume_latency is 0 means no restriction */
        if (resume_latency && resume_latency < latency_req)
                latency_req = resume_latency;
@@ -389,78 +298,6 @@ static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int 
index)
        struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices);
 
        data->last_state_idx = index;
-       data->needs_update = 1;
-}
-
-/**
- * menu_update - attempts to guess what happened after entry
- * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data
- * @dev: the CPU
- */
-static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
-{
-       struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices);
-       int last_idx = data->last_state_idx;
-       struct cpuidle_state *target = &drv->states[last_idx];
-       unsigned int measured_us;
-       unsigned int new_factor;
-
-       /*
-        * Try to figure out how much time passed between entry to low
-        * power state and occurrence of the wakeup event.
-        *
-        * If the entered idle state didn't support residency measurements,
-        * we use them anyway if they are short, and if long,
-        * truncate to the whole expected time.
-        *
-        * Any measured amount of time will include the exit latency.
-        * Since we are interested in when the wakeup begun, not when it
-        * was completed, we must subtract the exit latency. However, if
-        * the measured amount of time is less than the exit latency,
-        * assume the state was never reached and the exit latency is 0.
-        */
-
-       /* measured value */
-       measured_us = cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev);
-
-       /* Deduct exit latency */
-       if (measured_us > 2 * target->exit_latency)
-               measured_us -= target->exit_latency;
-       else
-               measured_us /= 2;
-
-       /* Make sure our coefficients do not exceed unity */
-       if (measured_us > data->next_timer_us)
-               measured_us = data->next_timer_us;
-
-       /* Update our correction ratio */
-       new_factor = data->correction_factor[data->bucket];
-       new_factor -= new_factor / DECAY;
-
-       if (data->next_timer_us > 0 && measured_us < MAX_INTERESTING)
-               new_factor += RESOLUTION * measured_us / data->next_timer_us;
-       else
-               /*
-                * we were idle so long that we count it as a perfect
-                * prediction
-                */
-               new_factor += RESOLUTION;
-
-       /*
-        * We don't want 0 as factor; we always want at least
-        * a tiny bit of estimated time. Fortunately, due to rounding,
-        * new_factor will stay nonzero regardless of measured_us values
-        * and the compiler can eliminate this test as long as DECAY > 1.
-        */
-       if (DECAY == 1 && unlikely(new_factor == 0))
-               new_factor = 1;
-
-       data->correction_factor[data->bucket] = new_factor;
-
-       /* update the repeating-pattern data */
-       data->intervals[data->interval_ptr++] = measured_us;
-       if (data->interval_ptr >= INTERVALS)
-               data->interval_ptr = 0;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to