4.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> commit 7d894e6e34a5cdd12309c7e4a3f830277ad4b7bf upstream. Then 'this_cpu' and 'prev_cpu' are in the same socket, select_idle_sibling() will do its thing regardless of the return value of wake_affine(). Just return true and don't look at all the other things. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5399,6 +5399,13 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_doma this_load = target_load(this_cpu, idx); /* + * Common case: CPUs are in the same socket, and select_idle_sibling() + * will do its thing regardless of what we return: + */ + if (cpus_share_cache(prev_cpu, this_cpu)) + return true; + + /* * If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible) * effect of the currently running task from the load * of the current CPU: @@ -5986,11 +5993,15 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct * if (affine_sd) { sd = NULL; /* Prefer wake_affine over balance flags */ - if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, prev_cpu, sync)) + if (cpu == prev_cpu) + goto pick_cpu; + + if (wake_affine(affine_sd, p, prev_cpu, sync)) new_cpu = cpu; } if (!sd) { + pick_cpu: if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) /* XXX always ? */ new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);
