ftrace can fail to allocate per-CPU ring buffer on systems with a large
number of CPUs coupled while large amounts of cache happening in the
page cache. Currently the ring buffer allocation doesn't retry in the VM
implementation even if direct-reclaim made some progress but still
wasn't able to find a free page. On retrying I see that the allocations
almost always succeed. The retry doesn't happen because __GFP_NORETRY is
used in the tracer to prevent the case where we might OOM, however if we
drop __GFP_NORETRY, we risk destabilizing the system if OOM killer is
triggered. To prevent this situation, use the __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL flag
introduced recently [1].

Tested the following still succeeds without destabilizing a system with
1GB memory.
echo 300000 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=149820805124906&w=2

Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.du...@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
Cc: Hao Lee <haolee.sw...@gmail.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov....@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmur...@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joe...@google.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 4ae268e687fe..529cc50d7243 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1136,12 +1136,12 @@ static int __rb_allocate_pages(long nr_pages, struct 
list_head *pages, int cpu)
        for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
                struct page *page;
                /*
-                * __GFP_NORETRY flag makes sure that the allocation fails
-                * gracefully without invoking oom-killer and the system is
-                * not destabilized.
+                * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL flag makes sure that the allocation fails
+                * gracefully without invoking oom-killer and the system is not
+                * destabilized.
                 */
                bpage = kzalloc_node(ALIGN(sizeof(*bpage), cache_line_size()),
-                                   GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY,
+                                   GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
                                    cpu_to_node(cpu));
                if (!bpage)
                        goto free_pages;
@@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ static int __rb_allocate_pages(long nr_pages, struct 
list_head *pages, int cpu)
                list_add(&bpage->list, pages);
 
                page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu),
-                                       GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY, 0);
+                                       GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, 0);
                if (!page)
                        goto free_pages;
                bpage->page = page_address(page);
-- 
2.13.2.725.g09c95d1e9-goog

Reply via email to