On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> [170711 02:48]: > And "external abort on non-linefetch" means something is not clocked > in this case. The following alone makes things boot for me again, but I don't > quite follow what has now changed with the ordering.. Thomas, any ideas?
Ah. Now that makes sense. Unpatched the ordering is: chip_bus_lock(desc); irq_request_resources(desc); Now the offending change reordered the calls. OMAP gpio has: omap_gpio_irq_bus_lock() pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->chip.parent); So that at least explains the error. So that omap gpio irq chip (ab)uses the bus_lock() callback to do runtime power management. Sigh, I did not expect that. Let me have a deeper look if that's OMAP only or whether this happens in other places as well. Thanks, tglx