On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 11:05 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:02:10AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > This patch has been rejected by Linus. > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/7/579 > > Hrm, when I used to push the register definition patches I did elide all > the obviously repeated register banks like the write sequencer one that > Linus is calling out there. I'm surprised by the "every single line" > bit though...
Linux doesn't say what he wants us to do about it. I could manually strip out a few more definitions but seriously, it makes the code a lot harder to maintain if we can't grep it for use of registers and register fields. They are big chips, they have a lot of stuff in the registers.
