On 07/13/2017 09:47 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

> Thanks for your analysis!
> 
>> What happens if you try the below patch instead of the revert?  Any
>> chance the offending instruction goes away?
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> index 11433f9..beac907 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ __typeof__(__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(x) > 
>> sizeof(0UL), 0ULL, 0UL))
>>      might_fault();                                                  \
>>      asm volatile("call __get_user_%P4"                              \
>>                   : "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu), "+r" (__sp)    \
>> -                 : "0" (ptr), "i" (sizeof(*(ptr))));                \
>> +                 : "0" (ptr), "i" (sizeof(*(ptr))), "r" (__sp));    \
>>      (x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr))) __val_gu;                    \
>>      __builtin_expect(__ret_gu, 0);                                  \
>>  })
> 
> The generated code is basically the same, only that now the value from
> the stack is stored in a register and written twice to RSP:
> 

AFAIR clang works much better with global named registers.
Could you check if the patch bellow helps?


---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index a059aac9e937..121204387978 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -157,15 +157,18 @@ __typeof__(__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(x) > sizeof(0UL), 
0ULL, 0UL))
  * Clang/LLVM cares about the size of the register, but still wants
  * the base register for something that ends up being a pair.
  */
+
+register unsigned long __current_sp asm(_ASM_SP);
+
 #define get_user(x, ptr)                                               \
 ({                                                                     \
        int __ret_gu;                                                   \
        register __inttype(*(ptr)) __val_gu asm("%"_ASM_DX);            \
-       register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP);                               \
        __chk_user_ptr(ptr);                                            \
        might_fault();                                                  \
        asm volatile("call __get_user_%P4"                              \
-                    : "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu), "+r" (__sp)    \
+                    : "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu),                \
+                      "+r" (__current_sp)                              \
                     : "0" (ptr), "i" (sizeof(*(ptr))));                \
        (x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr))) __val_gu;                    \
        __builtin_expect(__ret_gu, 0);                                  \
-- 
2.13.0


Reply via email to