On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:13:37 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:39:10 +0200 Tilman Schmidt wrote: > >> We *did* reach a consensus that isdn4linux is not obsolete in the >> accepted sense of the word, because there is no replacement for it >> so far. >> >> OTOH I have since submitted (twice, in fact) a patch that would remove >> the "(obsolete)" label from the Kconfig entry, but somehow nothing >> ever became of it. My submissions just linger in LKML, uncommented and >> unmerged. > > Did you submit the patch to Andrew Morton?
No. The recipients I chose were Karsten Keil as the subsystem maintainer, i4ldeveloper as the subsystem specific list, and LKML. > Is the patch in the -mm patchset? No. Should it be? It's not as if there was anything to test. It's purely a textual change in Kconfig messages. > Did Karsten ack the patch? No. He hasn't replied at all. > If the patch is in -mm and it's not critical (like this subject), > then it probably won't be merged until after 2.6.21 is released... Fine by me, as long as it does get merged eventually so I can stop watching for attempts to remove isdn4linux as obsolete. -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature