On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:47:57PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > That should to be "default" because the original code would have the proc > > entry display "default" unless it was set at runtime. Pretty weird I > > know but it's always possible someone is parsing the original default > > and not handling it properly. > > Ohh, right! That is indeed strange. Then I guess it would be probably > better to simply return Node to make it clear what the default is. What > do you think? >
That would work too. The casing still matches. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
