On 07/10, Kiran Gunda wrote:
>
> -static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pa, u16 ppid)
> +static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
> {
> + struct apid_data *apid_info = &pmic_arb->apid_data[pmic_arb->last_apid];
> u32 regval, offset;
> - u16 apid;
> - u16 id;
> + u16 id, i;
>
> /*
> - * PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL is a table in HW mapping channel to ppid.
> + * PMIC_ARB_REG_APID is a table in HW mapping apid to ppid.
> * ppid_to_apid is an in-memory invert of that table.
> */
> - for (apid = pa->last_apid; ; apid++) {
> - offset = PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(apid);
> - if (offset >= pa->core_size)
> + for (i = pmic_arb->last_apid; ; i++, apid_info++) {
Can we keep apid instead of replacing it with i please? That will
reduce the noise in this function.
> + offset = PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(i);
> + if (offset >= pmic_arb->core_size)
> break;
>
> - regval = readl_relaxed(pa->cnfg +
> - SPMI_OWNERSHIP_TABLE_REG(apid));
> - pa->apid_data[apid].owner = SPMI_OWNERSHIP_PERIPH2OWNER(regval);
> + regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->cnfg +
> + SPMI_OWNERSHIP_TABLE_REG(i));
> + apid_info->owner = SPMI_OWNERSHIP_PERIPH2OWNER(regval);
>
> - regval = readl_relaxed(pa->core + offset);
> + regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + offset);
> if (!regval)
> continue;
>
> id = (regval >> 8) & PMIC_ARB_PPID_MASK;
> - pa->ppid_to_apid[id] = apid | PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
> - pa->apid_data[apid].ppid = id;
> + pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[id] = i | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
> + apid_info->ppid = id;
> if (id == ppid) {
> - apid |= PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
> + i |= PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
> break;
> }
> }
> - pa->last_apid = apid & ~PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
> + pmic_arb->last_apid = i & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
>
> - return apid;
> + return i;
> }
Otherwise patch looks ok.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
