Vince Weaver <[email protected]> writes: > I was tracking down some regressions in my perf_event_test testsuite. > Some of the tests broke in the 4.11-rc1 timeframe. > > I've bisected one of them, this report is about > tests/overflow/simul_oneshot_group_overflow > This test creates an event group containing two sampling events, set > to overflow to a signal handler (which disables and then refreshes the > event). > > On a good kernel you get the following: > Event perf::instructions with period 1000000 > Event perf::instructions with period 2000000 > fd 3 overflows: 946 (perf::instructions/1000000) > fd 4 overflows: 473 (perf::instructions/2000000) > Ending counts: > Count 0: 946379875 > Count 1: 946365218 > > With the broken kernels you get: > Event perf::instructions with period 1000000 > Event perf::instructions with period 2000000 > fd 3 overflows: 938 (perf::instructions/1000000) > fd 4 overflows: 318 (perf::instructions/2000000) > Ending counts: > Count 0: 946373080 > Count 1: 653373058
I'm not sure I'm seeing it (granted, it's a friday evening): is it the difference in overflow counts? Also, are they cpu or task bound? Regards, -- Alex
