On 2017/7/18 3:48, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 7/17/2017 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> Of course, this all assumes a Gaussian distribution to begin with, if we >> get bimodal (or worse) distributions we can still get it wrong. To fix >> that, we'd need to do something better than what we currently have. >> > > fwiw some time ago I made a chart for predicted vs actual so you can sort > of judge the distribution of things visually > > http://git.fenrus.org/tmp/linux2.png > > This does not look like a Gaussian, does it? I mean abs(expected - actual).
Thanks, -Aubrey
