On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:14:29PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: > > Also, we're thinking that some operations require that you first "acquire > > ownership" of the respective device, which I believe maps more easily to > > open() and ioctls than sysfs. > > > > Thanks > > - Enno > > Yes, sysfs doesn't implement open/close so there's no clean way to > have one thing in userspace that owns the interface. It's a shame.
No, that was by design :)
