On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
> The cred_prepared bprm flag has a misleading name. It has nothing to do
> with the bprm_prepare_cred hook, and actually tracks if bprm_set_creds has
> been called. Rename this flag and improve its comment.
>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
> Cc: John Johansen <john.johan...@canonical.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com>
> Cc: Stephen Smalley <s...@tycho.nsa.gov>
> Cc: Casey Schaufler <ca...@schaufler-ca.com>
> Cc: James Morris <james.l.mor...@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  fs/binfmt_flat.c           | 2 +-
>  fs/exec.c                  | 2 +-
>  include/linux/binfmts.h    | 8 ++++++--
>  security/apparmor/domain.c | 2 +-
>  security/selinux/hooks.c   | 2 +-
>  security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
>  security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c   | 2 +-
>  7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_flat.c b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> index 2edcefc0a294..a722530cc468 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static int load_flat_shared_library(int id, struct 
> lib_info *libs)
>          * as we're past the point of no return and are dealing with shared
>          * libraries.
>          */
> -       bprm.cred_prepared = 1;
> +       bprm.called_set_creds = 1;

WTF is this?  It's not, strictly speaking, a bug in this patch, but
it's nonsensical.  Is it fixed (presuably deleted) later?

Otherwise looks good.

Reply via email to