On Thu 29-06-17 10:46:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Forgot to CC Hugh.
> 
> Hugh, Andrew, do you see this could cause any problem wrt.
> ksm/khugepaged exit path?

ping. I would really appreciate some help here. I would like to resend
the patch soon.

> On Mon 26-06-17 15:03:46, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> > 
> > David has noticed that the oom killer might kill additional tasks while
> > the existing victim hasn't terminated yet because the oom_reaper marks
> > the curent victim MMF_OOM_SKIP too early when mm->mm_users dropped down
> > to 0. The race is as follows
> > 
> > oom_reap_task                               do_exit
> >                                       exit_mm
> >   __oom_reap_task_mm
> >                                         mmput
> >                                           __mmput
> >     mmget_not_zero # fails
> >                                                     exit_mmap # frees memory
> >   set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP)
> > 
> > Currently we are try to reduce a risk of this race by taking oom_lock
> > and wait for out_of_memory sleep while holding the lock to give the
> > victim some time to exit. This is quite suboptimal approach because
> > there is no guarantee the victim (especially a large one) will manage
> > to unmap its address space and free enough memory to the particular oom
> > domain which needs a memory (e.g. a specific NUMA node).
> > 
> > Fix this problem by allowing __oom_reap_task_mm and __mmput path to
> > race. __oom_reap_task_mm is basically MADV_DONTNEED and that is allowed
> > to run in parallel with other unmappers (hence the mmap_sem for read).
> > The only tricky part is we have to exclude page tables tear down and all
> > operations which modify the address space in the __mmput path. exit_mmap
> > doesn't expect any other users so it doesn't use any locking. Nothing
> > really forbids us to use mmap_sem for write, though. In fact we are
> > already relying on this lock earlier in the __mmput path to synchronize
> > with ksm and khugepaged.
> > 
> > Take the exclusive mmap_sem when calling free_pgtables and destroying
> > vmas to sync with __oom_reap_task_mm which take the lock for read. All
> > other operations can safely race with the parallel unmap.
> > 
> > Reported-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
> > Fixes: 26db62f179d1 ("oom: keep mm of the killed task available")
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Hi,
> > I am sending this as an RFC because I am not yet sure I haven't missed
> > something subtle here but the appoach should work in principle. I have
> > run it through some of my OOM stress tests to see if anything blows up
> > and it all went smoothly.
> > 
> > The issue has been brought up by David [1]. There were some attempts to
> > address it in oom proper [2][3] but the first one would cause problems
> > on their own [4] while the later is just too hairy.
> > 
> > Thoughts, objections, alternatives?
> > 
> > [1] 
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.deb.2.10.1706141632100.93...@chino.kir.corp.google.com
> > [2] 
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201706171417.jhg48401.joqlhmfsvoo...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
> > [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201706220053.v5m0rmou078...@www262.sakura.ne.jp
> > [4] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201706210217.v5l2hazc081...@www262.sakura.ne.jp
> > 
> >  mm/mmap.c     |  7 +++++++
> >  mm/oom_kill.c | 40 ++--------------------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > index 3bd5ecd20d4d..253808e716dc 100644
> > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -2962,6 +2962,11 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >     /* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */
> >     unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1);
> >  
> > +   /*
> > +    * oom reaper might race with exit_mmap so make sure we won't free
> > +    * page tables or unmap VMAs under its feet
> > +    */
> > +   down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >     free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING);
> >     tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);
> >  
> > @@ -2974,7 +2979,9 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >                     nr_accounted += vma_pages(vma);
> >             vma = remove_vma(vma);
> >     }
> > +   mm->mmap = NULL;
> >     vm_unacct_memory(nr_accounted);
> > +   up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* Insert vm structure into process list sorted by address
> > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> > index 0e2c925e7826..5dc0ff22d567 100644
> > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> > @@ -472,36 +472,8 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct 
> > *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
> >     struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> >     bool ret = true;
> >  
> > -   /*
> > -    * We have to make sure to not race with the victim exit path
> > -    * and cause premature new oom victim selection:
> > -    * __oom_reap_task_mm           exit_mm
> > -    *   mmget_not_zero
> > -    *                                mmput
> > -    *                                  atomic_dec_and_test
> > -    *                                exit_oom_victim
> > -    *                              [...]
> > -    *                              out_of_memory
> > -    *                                select_bad_process
> > -    *                                  # no TIF_MEMDIE task selects new 
> > victim
> > -    *  unmap_page_range # frees some memory
> > -    */
> > -   mutex_lock(&oom_lock);
> > -
> > -   if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
> > -           ret = false;
> > -           goto unlock_oom;
> > -   }
> > -
> > -   /*
> > -    * increase mm_users only after we know we will reap something so
> > -    * that the mmput_async is called only when we have reaped something
> > -    * and delayed __mmput doesn't matter that much
> > -    */
> > -   if (!mmget_not_zero(mm)) {
> > -           up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > -           goto unlock_oom;
> > -   }
> > +   if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem))
> > +           return false;
> >  
> >     /*
> >      * Tell all users of get_user/copy_from_user etc... that the content
> > @@ -538,14 +510,6 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct 
> > *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
> >                     K(get_mm_counter(mm, MM_SHMEMPAGES)));
> >     up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >  
> > -   /*
> > -    * Drop our reference but make sure the mmput slow path is called from a
> > -    * different context because we shouldn't risk we get stuck there and
> > -    * put the oom_reaper out of the way.
> > -    */
> > -   mmput_async(mm);
> > -unlock_oom:
> > -   mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.11.0
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > the body to majord...@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>
> 
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to