On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote: > +#define ASM_UNREACHABLE > \ > + "999: .pushsection .discard.unreachable\n\t" \ > + ".long 999b - .\n\t" \ > + ".popsection\n\t"
Will this end up running into the same bug fixed with 3d1e236022cc1426b0834565995ddee2ca231cee and the __LINE__ macro? I could tell under which conditions gcc would do this kind of merging... -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
