Ingo Molnar wrote: [Wed Apr 18 2007, 06:02:28PM EDT] > > * Christian Hesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > although probably your suspend2 problem is still not fixed, it's > > > worth a try nevertheless. Which suspend2 patch did you apply, and > > > was it against -rc6 or -rc7? > > > > You are right again. ;-) > > > > Linux 2.6.21-rc7 > > Suspend2 2.2.9.11 (applies cleanly to -rc7) > > CFS v3 (without any additional patches) > > > > And it still hangs on suspend. > > what's the easiest way for me to try suspend2? Apply the patch, reboot > into the kernel, then execute what command to suspend? (there's a > confusing mismash of initiators of all the suspend variants. Can i drive > this by echoing to /sys/power/state?) > > Ingo I had hoped to collect more data with CFS V2. It crashes in scale_nice_down for s2ram when attempting to disable_nonboot_cpus. So part of traceback looks like (typed by hand with obvious omissions):
scale_nice_down update_stats_wait_end - not shown in traceback because inlined pick_next_task_fair migration_call task_rq_lock notifier_call_chain _cpu_down disable_nonboot_cpus ... This is standard -rc7 with V2 CFS applied. It could be a completely unrelated issue. I'll attempt to debug further tomorrow. bob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
