Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote: > > The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample > > entries. > > hi, > was there any change to the rfc post?
I was wondering that, please stick a v1, v2, etc to the subject, and state the changes across versions, to make things clear. - Arnaldo > thanks, > jirka > > > > > Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate > > the introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series > > adds the dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to > > them. > > > > This change adds an additional argument to the affected handlers. To > > keep backwards compatibility (and avoid unnecessary work), do not pass > > the aforementioned dict if the number of arguments signals that handler > > version predates this change. > > > > In addition, provide time_enabled, time_running and counter value in the > > perf_sample dict. > > > > Initial Discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/1/108 > > > > Arun Kalyanasundaram (5): > > perf script python: Allocate memory only if handler exists > > perf script python: Refactor creation of perf sample dict > > perf script python: Add sample_read to dict > > perf script python: Add perf_sample dict to tracepoint handlers > > perf script python: Generate hooks with additional argument > > > > .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c | 246 > > +++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.14.0.rc0.284.gd933b75aa4-goog > >
