On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > Someone pointed out that the rule is probably not OK when the address of > > the static variable is taken, because then it is likely being used as > > permanent storage. > > Makes sense to me. > > > An improved rule is: > > Do you think it is worth having it in scripts/coccinelle/ ? Sure. Now that it has been a bit more sanity checked. > I don't think Gustavo would mind putting it there :) OK, I will check with him. julia > > Thanks. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. > -- >