I am not aware of any updates to IO scheduler other than what is listed on the website. Chandra/Shailabh can correct me if I am wrong.
Regarding (the future of) CKRM in general, we aren't looking at that framework now, as Linux kernel community seemed to want simpler frameworks. A framework which is being considered for inclusion (hopefully in near future) will be based on this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/6/297 On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:09:17PM +0800, Zongyun Lai wrote: > Hello, > I am currently doing something related to storage QoS. I have read the > OLS > papers of CKRM project. I think it would be good start point for CBQ(class > based queuing) scheduler in storage system. However, when I refer to the code > in ckrm.sf.net, I found only recent release of cpurc, memrc, and res_group > code, isn't it? The only io related work is the io_rc.tar.bz2 located in > ckrm-old branch (e18 against 2.6.12). It looks like it is based on Jens' CFQ > scheduler. Do you still actively maintain this ckrm project? Is there any > recent release of the IO scheduler, or what is the future consideration in > developing the IO scheduer? Thanks. > > > Cheers , > Zongyun > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > ckrm-tech mailing list > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/