Matt Mackall wrote:
> I think adding a flags field and an allocate flag to my callback
> struct would be sufficient here.
>
Yes, probably.
What about something that wants to shatter superpages?
> The syntax is horrible, but I don't think we end up using the
> resultant type enough to justify the namespace pollution.
>
Don't know that that's a huge concern. The typedef namespace (*_t) is
pretty empty, and its not like we're talking about something that's
visible outside the kernel. And the syntax is *really* ugly.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
