I noticed relatively late and it hadn't occured on my own testing. I can
send it as a separate patch but I wanted to highlight that it would affect
a 4.12.4 release.

---8<---
sched/cputime: Don't use smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

commit 0e4097c3354e2f5a5ad8affd9dc7f7f7d00bb6b9 upstream

Recent kernels trigger this warning:

 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: 99-trinity/181
 caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
 CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: 99-trinity Not tainted 4.12.0-01059-g2a42eb9 #1
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x82/0xb8
  check_preemption_disabled()
  debug_smp_processor_id()
  vtime_delta()
  task_cputime()
  thread_group_cputime()
  thread_group_cputime_adjusted()
  wait_consider_task()
  do_wait()
  SYSC_wait4()
  do_syscall_64()
  entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path()

As Frederic pointed out:

| Although those sched_clock_cpu() things seem to only matter when the
| sched_clock() is unstable. And that stability is a condition for nohz_full
| to work anyway. So probably sched_clock() alone would be enough.

This patch fixes it by replacing sched_clock_cpu() with sched_clock() to
avoid calling smp_processor_id() in a preemptible context.

Reported-by: Xiaolong Ye <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Prettified the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 3dafea579263..ad275b25e3f9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u64 vtime_delta(struct vtime *vtime)
 {
        unsigned long long clock;
 
-       clock = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+       clock = sched_clock();
        if (clock < vtime->starttime)
                return 0;
 
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ void arch_vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
 
        write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
        vtime->state = VTIME_SYS;
-       vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+       vtime->starttime = sched_clock();
        write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
 }
 
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void vtime_init_idle(struct task_struct *t, int cpu)
        local_irq_save(flags);
        write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
        vtime->state = VTIME_SYS;
-       vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+       vtime->starttime = sched_clock();
        write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
        local_irq_restore(flags);
 }

Reply via email to